Joint article: Skin sensitization assessment for wearable devices



Advancing skin sensitization assessment for wearable devices

Assessing the Skin Sensitizing Potential of Constituents and Leachables from Wearable Devices Using GARDskin and Associated Applications

A new joint article has been published in Toxics, providing new peer-reviewed evidence demonstrating how the GARD® assays can support both quantitative risk assessment of wearable device constituents and hazard identification of leachables from finished products.

As wearable technologies continue to evolve, safety assessment presents unique challenges. Materials are often complex, multi-component, and intended for prolonged skin contact. This study highlights how New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) can generate the information needed for both product development and final product safety evaluations.

About the study

The study explores two complementary non-animal testing applications:

Part 1: Quantitative potency assessment of wearable device constituents
Six representative chemicals commonly used in wearable devices, including three acrylate monomers, two acrylamide monomers, and one reactive dye, were evaluated using GARD®skin Dose-Response to determine skin sensitization potency and derive Points of Departure (PoDs) for quantitative risk assessment.

Part 2: Hazard identification of leachables from finished products
In a proof-of-concept case study, GARD®skin Medical Device was used to evaluate extracts of MED-2000 prepared in both polar and non-polar extraction vehicles and spiked with the known sensitizer isobornyl acrylate (IBOA).

Key findings:

  • All six wearable-relevant test chemicals were correctly identified as skin sensitizers, demonstrating strong performance within this applicability domain.
  • GARD®skin Dose-Response generated quantitative potency estimates that were in line with available in vivo reference data and showed good concordance with potency values generated using defined approaches.
  • GARD®skin Medical Device successfully detected IBOA in both polar and non-polar material extracts, supporting its applicability for testing leachables from solid materials and wearable devices.

Together, these findings demonstrate how GARD®-based testing strategies can support both safer-by-design product development and the biological safety assessment of final wearable devices, while reducing reliance on animal testing.

Authors

We extend our sincere gratitude to the outstanding team members who contributed to this scientific collaboration: Ravi Persaud1, Andy Forreryd2, Robin Gradin2, Emma Anders2, Johan Andersson2, Per Alftrén2, Henrik Johansson2 and, Nakul Ruparel1

1Apple, Inc., Cupertino, CA 95014, USA
2SenzaGen AB, SE-22481 Lund, Sweden

Keywords

wearable devices; skin sensitization; GARD; quantitative potency assessment


Abstract

Pre-clinical toxicological evaluation is an essential component of ensuring the safety and compatibility of wearable devices with biological systems. Along with the local endpoints of cytotoxicity and irritation, skin sensitization is a core toxicological endpoint. Testing wearable devices, which are often solid and composed of multiple components, presents new challenges for New Approach Methods. In the current proof-of-concept study, we propose a strategy for conducting risk assessment of the individual components and the leachables from wearable devices.

The GARDskin Dose-Response assay (OECD TGP 4.106) was used to predict the skin sensitization potency of three acrylate monomers, two acrylamide monomers, and one reactive dye. The GARDskin Medical Device (ISO 10993-10:2021, Annex C) was used to classify MED-2000 extracts spiked with isobornyl acrylate. All chemicals were classified as skin sensitizers. The quantitative potency predictions correlated well with available data from defined approaches and produced near-identical potency rankings.

Available human and animal reference data were too sparse and heterogenous to substantiate agreement in potency. Finally, the GARDskin Medical Device assay correctly classified the spiked extract as skin sensitizing. In conclusion, the GARDskin assay and associated applications are well adapted to address the testing requirements for wearable devices.

 

SenzaGen’s Newsletter Q3 2026

Click image to view the Newsletter in browser.

 

Text version:

SenzaGen Newsletter Q3, 2026

Essential Oils, Natural Extracts and “Difficult-to-test” samples at Eurotox

Skin sensitization potency assessment, “difficult-to-test” substances and respiratory sensitization were among the key topics discussed during our hosted session at EUROTOX 2026.
Together with experts from ExxonMobil, dōTERRA, and the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials (RIFM), we explored applications ranging from Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) of Essential Oils and Natural Extracts to regulatory testing under OECD DA 497. These discussions continue in our recent scientific publication and upcoming expert roundtable.

New peer-reviewed publication
Predicting quantitative skin sensitization potency in Essential Oils

One of the topics discussed at EUROTOX 2026 was the use of GARD® data for quantitative skin sensitization potency assessment of Complex Mixtures such as Essential Oils, a representative class of Natural Complex Substances (NCS).

In a newly published study, the authors demonstrate how GARD®skin Dose-Response data can be used to derive No-Expected-Sensitization Induction Levels (NESILs) of Essential Oils. Importantly, the results show strong overall concordance with historical LLNA data, supporting the use of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) to derive Points of Departure (PoDs) for quantitative skin sensitization risk assessment.

Read the joint article with dōTERRA.

Upcoming expert roundtable
Assessing skin sensitization potency of Complex Mixtures

How can reliable skin sensitization potency estimates be generated for Natural Complex Substances and other complex mixtures using New Approach Methodologies (NAMs)?

Building on both the recent publication and discussions at EUROTOX 2026, our upcoming expert roundtable will explore scientific, regulatory and practical perspectives on potency assessment, including current challenges, data interpretation and future opportunities.

Read more and register for the webinar

OECD review highlights advances in respiratory sensitization assessment

The OECD has published its Detailed Review Paper on Respiratory Sensitization, an important step toward advancing non-animal testing and future regulatory acceptance of respiratory sensitization assessments.

The report reviews current scientific understanding, regulatory needs and available NAMs, while outlining a path toward harmonized testing strategies.

SenzaGen contributed to the international expert group behind the publication, and GARD®air is included in the report’s review of available methods. Supported by the largest application dataset currently available for this endpoint, GARD®air continues to contribute to the scientific foundation for non-animal respiratory sensitization assessment.

Reference: OECD (2026), Detailed Review Paper on Respiratory Sensitisation, OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, OECD Publishing, Paris 
Read the OECD Review Paper

Upcoming events

🎧 Webinar/Expert roundtable: Skin sensitization potency of Complex Mixtures | Oct 6
🌎 Conference: Biocompatibility Insights 2026 | Copenhagen, Denmark | Oct 13-14
🌎 Conference: ACT 2026 | San Antonio TX, United States | Nov 15-18