An integrated transcriptomic- and proteomic-based approach to evaluate the human skin sensitization potential of glyphosate and its commercial agrochemical formulations

Journal of Proteomics Available online 30 January 2020, 03647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103647 Tim Lindberg, Renato Ivan de Ávila, Kathrin S. Zeller, Fredrik Levander, Dennis Eriksson, Aakash Chawaded, Malin Lindstedt Highlights Pure glyphosate was classified as a non-sensitizer using in vitro assessment. POEA, POEA+glyphosate mixture and formulations were identified as skin sensitizers. MS analysis identified protein groups related […]

Journal of Proteomics
Available online 30 January 2020, 03647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103647

Tim Lindberg, Renato Ivan de Ávila, Kathrin S. Zeller, Fredrik Levander, Dennis Eriksson, Aakash Chawaded, Malin Lindstedt

Highlights

  • Pure glyphosate was classified as a non-sensitizer using in vitro assessment.
  • POEA, POEA+glyphosate mixture and formulations were identified as skin sensitizers.
  • MS analysis identified protein groups related to immunologically relevant events.
  • Autophagy may be involved in the agrochemical materials-induced DC responses.

Abstract
We investigated the skin sensitization hazard of glyphosate, the surfactant polyethylated tallow amine (POEA) and two commercial glyphosate-containing formulations using different omics-technologies based on a human dendritic cell (DC)-like cell line. First, the GARD™skin assay, investigating changes in the expression of 200 transcripts upon cell exposure to xenobiotics, was used for skin sensitization prediction. POEA and the formulations were classified as skin sensitizers while glyphosate alone was classified as a non-sensitizer. Interestingly, the mixture of POEA together with glyphosate displayed a similar sensitizing prediction as POEA alone, indicating that glyphosate likely does not increase the sensitizing capacity when associated with POEA. Moreover, mass spectrometry analysis identified differentially regulated protein groups and predicted molecular pathways based on a proteomic approach in response to cell exposures with glyphosate, POEA and the glyphosate-containing formulations. Based on the protein expression data, predicted pathways were linked to immunologically relevant events and regulated proteins further to cholesterol biosynthesis and homeostasis as well as to autophagy, identifying novel aspects of DC responses after exposure to xenobiotics. In summary, we here present an integrative analysis involving advanced technologies to elucidate the molecular mechanisms behind DC activation in the skin sensitization process triggered by the investigated agrochemical materials.

Significance
The use of glyphosate has increased worldwide, and much effort has been made to improve risk assessments and to further elucidate the mechanisms behind any potential human health hazard of this chemical and its agrochemical formulations. In this context, omics-based techniques can provide a multiparametric approach, including several biomarkers, to expand the mechanistic knowledge of xenobiotics-induced toxicity. Based on this, we performed the integration of GARD™skin and proteomic data to elucidate the skin sensitization hazard of POEA, glyphosate and its two commercial mixtures, and to investigate cellular responses more in detail on protein level. The proteomic data indicate the regulation of immune response-related pathways and proteins associated with cholesterol biosynthesis and homeostasis as well as to autophagy, identifying novel aspects of DC responses after exposure to xenobiotics. Therefore, our data show the applicability of a multiparametric integrated approach for the mechanism-based hazard evaluation of xenobiotics, eventually complementing decision making in the holistic risk assessment of chemicals regarding their allergenic potential in humans.

Full article
Article on line ahead of print